Xunlei Sues Ex‑CEO as Shell Companies, Affair and Procurement Allegations Surface in Rmb200m Claim

Xunlei has filed a Rmb200 million civil suit against its former CEO, alleging he diverted funds through a shell supplier and favoured relatives and a long‑term mistress in staffing and contracting decisions. The case highlights procurement vulnerabilities and governance failures that helped fuel heavy losses during an aggressive push into cloud and blockchain businesses, and follows a management reset that the company credits with a recent financial turnaround.

A group of men enjoying a lively beer pong game indoors with vibrant decor and red cups.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Xunlei alleges former CEO Chen Lei diverted corporate funds through a shell supplier, seeking about Rmb200 million in damages.
  • 2NetHeart Technology paid roughly Rmb170 million to the supplier between early 2019 and early 2020, according to company audits.
  • 3Allegations link the misconduct to nepotism and an extramarital relationship with senior executive Dong Xue, who benefited from promotions and contracts.
  • 4Chen was dismissed in April 2020 after reportedly leaving China for the U.S.; previous criminal complaints were withdrawn, but the new civil suit renews scrutiny.
  • 5The case illustrates broader procurement and governance risks in Chinese tech firms and follows industry efforts to normalise anti‑fraud controls.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

This episode crystallises several pressures facing China’s technology sector: the temptation for executives with wide discretion to monetise procurement, the reputational and financial fragility that follows when ambitious technology projects fail, and the regulatory emphasis on better corporate governance after high‑profile scandals. For investors, the immediate lesson is heightened due diligence on procurement practices, conflict‑of‑interest disclosures and the independence of audit functions. For Chinese managers and regulators, the case strengthens the argument for formalising procurement standards, rotating signatories and insulating technical project sponsorship from personal networks. If the civil suit leads to criminal inquiry or asset recovery, it may encourage other firms to pursue civil remedies rather than rely solely on criminal investigations that can be stymied when suspects leave the jurisdiction.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

Chinese cloud‑services and peer‑to‑peer download firm Xunlei has launched a civil suit against its former chief executive, accusing him of diverting corporate assets through a network of shell companies and seeking roughly Rmb200 million in damages. The lawsuit, made public by multiple Chinese outlets on January 15, alleges that the former CEO used a supplier called Xing Ronghe — in name a bandwidth vendor — to siphon funds from Xunlei’s wholly owned subsidiary NetHeart Technology, with payments of about Rmb170 million recorded between early 2019 and early 2020.

The accused, Chen Lei, was a high‑profile hire in 2014, arriving from stints at Google, Microsoft and Tencent and promoted within Xunlei from CTO to CEO. Internally he cultivated a “technology idealist” image and repeatedly claimed he was indifferent to money, a persona that helped justify rapid elevation and broad operational authority over cloud and blockchain initiatives that would later generate heavy losses.

Xunlei’s complaint threads alleged financial misconduct with a set of personal relationships and internal promotions. The company says Chen installed a former colleague, identified as Dong Xue, into senior commercial and human resources roles; her pay rose sharply after joining Xunlei and she is alleged to be a beneficiary or controller of several entities tied to Xing Ronghe. Employees say Dong and Chen had a long‑running extramarital relationship that produced a child while both were in senior roles.

The suit paints a familiar procurement‑fraud picture: a supplier with no real staff, qualifications or capital is used as a vehicle to extract company funds. Xunlei’s internal audit and subsequent public reporting say that Xing Ronghe’s shareholders and officers were largely Dong’s relatives, friends and local contacts, and that the company paid inflated consultant fees — including roughly Rmb2 million to two claimed “blockchain experts” who were later identified as elderly relatives from Dong’s hometown.

Beyond money flows, former employees describe a workplace captured by patronage and ritual. Staff report that participation in worship and singing at annual meetings became effectively a cultural litmus test for promotion, while Chen’s office allegedly contained domestic furnishings like a king‑size bed and he authorised lavish purchases on corporate cards. In the months before Chen’s dismissal in April 2020, core teams were reportedly shepherded to the shell supplier, prompting severance and option repurchases that cost NetHeart nearly Rmb9 million.

Xunlei removed Chen in April 2020; the criminal complaint filed earlier at local police that year was later withdrawn, in part after Chen is said to have left for the United States. His whereabouts are now unclear and phone numbers tied to him are unreachable. The current civil action accompanies a broader corporate clean‑up under new chairman Li Jinbo, who shut down the loss‑making blockchain and aggressive shared‑computing programmes and refocused resources on membership services, compliant cloud computing and overseas markets.

Xunlei’s financials, the company says, have recovered since the management change: its 2025 third‑quarter statement reported revenue of Rmb126 million, a 57% year‑on‑year rise, and a net profit figure of Rmb551 million. Whether the civil suit will succeed and whether it will precipitate renewed criminal inquiries remain open questions, but the case has already reopened public scrutiny of governance practices across China’s tech sector.

The Xunlei affair is part of a pattern: procurement and supplier relationships repeatedly surface in recent corruption cases because large, poorly standardised purchases create opportunities for collusion. The simultaneous disclosure that game developer Perfect World has criminal complaints pending over similar project‑level malfeasance underscores that the risk spans multiple subsectors. For investors and boards alike, the episode is a reminder that rapid executive hiring, concentrated sign‑off authority and weak procurement controls can turn technological ambitions into a vector for insider enrichment.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found