Brussels Moves to Ban Huawei and ZTE Gear from EU Networks, Pushing a Fraught Tech‑Sovereignty Agenda

The European Commission is preparing a draft cybersecurity law to make exclusion of so‑called "high‑risk" suppliers—targeting Huawei, ZTE and other Chinese vendors—mandatory across the EU. The proposal seeks to replace a voluntary 2020 framework with binding rules, but faces legal, economic and political hurdles including heavy reliance on Chinese-made solar panels and resistance from telecom operators and some member states.

European Union flag with missing stars representing Brexit concept.

Key Takeaways

  • 1The Commission aims to convert voluntary restrictions on "high‑risk" suppliers into binding EU rules that would phase out Huawei, ZTE and similar vendors from critical infrastructure.
  • 2The draft law would cover telecom networks, solar systems and security scanners, with timelines tied to assessed risk, costs and availability of alternatives.
  • 3Practical challenges include heavy EU dependence on Chinese-made solar panels (>90%), operator warnings about higher costs, and member‑state reluctance to cede national security decisions to Brussels.
  • 4Beijing has condemned the move as discriminatory and undocumented, arguing forced exclusions would harm European technology deployment and economic interests.
  • 5If adopted, the proposal would deepen EU‑China economic tensions and test Brussels’ ability to reconcile security objectives with industrial realities.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

The Commission’s shift from guidance to compulsion reflects a broader strategic recalibration: European capitals are increasingly comfortable treating access to critical infrastructure as a matter of political economy rather than pure market choice. That shift is driven by pressure from allies, domestic security constituencies, and internal calls to bolster "technological sovereignty." Yet policy ambition collides with supply‑chain dependence and legal sovereignty: member states retain security prerogatives, operators depend on cost‑effective Chinese kit, and entire sectors (notably solar) lack quick alternatives. The most likely outcome is a negotiated compromise—stricter rules for mobile core networks and high‑risk elements, carve‑outs or longer phase‑ins for mass‑market equipment, and expanded support for European and allied suppliers. However, even a watered‑down measure would accelerate market bifurcation, prompt retaliation risks, and increase costs for consumers and projects reliant on Chinese components.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

The European Commission is preparing a legal push to force member states to phase out Chinese-made equipment from critical infrastructure, according to a Financial Times report that has rippled through Brussels and Beijing. The draft cybersecurity bill would convert voluntary limits on so-called "high-risk" suppliers—established in the 2020 5G toolbox—into binding EU-wide rules that could bar Huawei, ZTE and other Chinese firms from participating in telecom networks, solar installations and security scanners.

Brussels officials say any mandated removal would be phased in according to assessed risk levels, industry characteristics, cost and the availability of alternative suppliers. The proposal reportedly comes from the Commission’s team charged with technological sovereignty and aims to close what Brussels sees as a patchwork of inconsistent national rules that undermine a single-market response to security concerns.

The move escalates a policy process that has long split EU capitals. Some members—led by Germany and Sweden in earlier years—have already imposed strict limits on Chinese vendors in parts of their networks; others, including Spain and Greece, continue to host such equipment. That divergence is central to the Commission’s argument that voluntary guidance cannot deliver a common standard of trust across the single market.

Practical obstacles, however, are stark. In the solar industry more than nine in ten panels installed in the EU are manufactured in China, making any blanket exclusion politically and economically painful. Telecom operators have warned that outright bans could raise consumer prices, slow network rollouts and increase costs for fixed broadband upgrades at a time when fibre deployment is a priority.

Political pushback is also likely. Member states jealously guard national security prerogatives and have resisted ceding decision‑making authority on suppliers to Brussels. Several major operators in markets such as Spain and Germany have privately resisted stricter measures, and at least one recent Spanish procurement with Huawei proceeded after national officials judged there was no security risk.

Beijing has reacted sharply. Chinese officials have repeatedly demanded evidence for the security claims and warned that administrative exclusion of Chinese firms would violate market and non‑discrimination rules. At a November 2025 press briefing, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson framed forced removal as counterproductive, claiming it would retard technological progress and inflict economic losses on European firms and consumers.

The EU proposal—if advanced as written—would mark a decisive turn from coordination to compulsion in Brussels’ approach to supply‑chain risk. It would force European policymakers to choose between a unified, security‑driven industrial policy and the commercial and political realities of deep integration with Chinese manufacturing capacity. How that balance is struck will shape Europe’s access to affordable infrastructure, the pace of its broadband ambitions, and the broader arc of EU‑China economic relations at a time of intensifying transatlantic alignment on China policy.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found