China’s Restaurant Industry Is Souring: Xibei’s Store Closures Expose Wider Structural Pain

Xibei’s closure of 102 stores has become a high‑profile symbol of wider distress in China’s restaurant sector. Structural pressures—rising food and labour costs, falling per‑capita dining spend and tougher social‑insurance rules—are squeezing margins, prompting widespread closures, weak IPOs and a wave of industry consolidation.

Modern restaurant kitchen with chefs preparing food and waitress on side.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Xibei will close 102 stores (about 30% of its network), affecting over 4,000 employees, amid weak single‑store profitability (25% gross margin, ~5% net margin).
  • 2Macro pressures in 2025 included pork and vegetable price spikes (~28% and ~30%) and social‑insurance reforms that lifted labour costs 20–30%, pushing many operators into the red.
  • 3Per‑capita restaurant spending fell 7.7% to RMB 36.6 in 2025, with 65% of meals priced under RMB 30—evidence of widespread consumption downgrading.
  • 4Capital markets have soured on restaurant IPOs: Meet Noodles’ Hong Kong debut dropped 27.8% on day one, while chains like Ba Nu and Lao Xiang Ji face compliance and sustainability questions despite reported profits.
  • 5The restaurant sector supports roughly 30 million jobs and represents 11% of social retail sales; its weakening has macroeconomic and employment implications for China.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

The sector’s immediate problem is not a single viral controversy but a painful collision between cost inflation, tighter labour regulation and a loss of pricing power among consumers. That dynamic will accelerate consolidation: well‑capitalised chains that can compress formats, revise real‑estate footprints and absorb higher compliance costs will survive, while mid‑tier and heavily franchised operators face existential risk. Policymakers concerned about employment and domestic demand may offer targeted relief—subsidies, tax breaks or consumption vouchers—but those are stopgaps. Longer‑term recovery depends on firms reengineering operating models, embracing smaller formats and digital channels, and restoring value propositions that justify higher ticket prices.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

Xibei’s decision to close 102 outlets—roughly 30% of its network and a blow to more than 4,000 employees—has drawn outsized attention because the chain’s boss publicly blamed a social-media spat for the trouble. The public quarrel between Xibei’s Jia Guolong and internet celebrity Luo Yonghao made for a dramatic headline, but it risks obscuring a less sensational truth: the sector’s troubles are broad, structural and deepening.

Xibei’s own financials make that plain. The chain’s revenue slipped to about RMB 5.8 billion in 2024 from RMB 6.2 billion in 2023, even as the company added 18 net new stores. A 25% gross margin yielding only a 5% net margin shows weak single-store profitability; by contrast, peers such as Haidilao managed double‑digit net margins in the same period.

Cost pressures are central. Xibei faces annual labour bills exceeding RMB 1 billion and pays high rents for very large dining rooms that can run several hundred square metres. Many of the closed outlets were in China’s four first-tier cities—Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen—where management explicitly cited failed negotiations to reduce rent.

Those company-level strains sit atop an unforgiving macro picture. In 2025 pork and vegetable prices spiked by roughly 28% and 30% respectively, while new social‑insurance rules raised employment costs by an estimated 20–30%. Household spending points to consumer retrenchment: per‑capita dining spend fell to RMB 36.6 in 2025, down 7.7%, and 65% of meals were priced under RMB 30.

Capital markets are reflecting the malaise. An anticipated IPO boom for restaurant groups fizzled: tea brands managed to list, but several restaurant chains saw failed or weak flotations. Meet Noodles’ Hong Kong debut plunged 27.8% on day one and continued lower, a poor reception for a chain that reported only about RMB 60.7 million in net profit on RMB 1.154 billion of sales in 2024.

Profitability in some ostensibly successful chains also looks fragile once employment practices are examined. Ba Nu’s healthier margins were built alongside high shares of part‑time and outsourced staff and a record of underpaid social insurance of roughly RMB 4 million. Lao Xiang Ji’s shortfall in employee social contributions exceeded RMB 100 million, leaving both compliance and reputational risks as potential future costs.

The industry’s scale makes this more than a corporate problem. Restaurants account for about 11% of China’s retail sales of consumer goods and directly support some 30 million jobs. Broad erosion of margins, shrinking consumer spend and rising statutory labour costs point to likely consolidation, margin compression across the board and significant pressure on smaller and mid‑sized operators.

The skirmish between Jia and Luo is a convenient headline, but it is not the story. What matters for policymakers, investors and consumers alike is whether chains can redesign cost structures, rebuild pricing power, and survive a likely period of consolidation without further job losses. The next year will test whether the sector can adapt to higher labour standards and leaner consumer demand, or whether more high-profile closures and failed listings are in store.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found