China’s Zhipu Pushes Prices Up as GLM-5 Goes Global — A Turning Point for Domestic AI Commercialisation

Zhipu Technology raised prices for its GLM Coding Plan and launched GLM-5 overseas on February 12, citing surging developer demand and the need for heavier investment in compute and model optimisation. The increase — 30% or higher domestically and substantially larger on overseas API pricing — marks a shift in China’s AI industry from low‑price competition to value-based monetisation.

Colorful PHP code displayed on a dark screen, ideal for programming themes.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Zhipu implemented a structural price increase for GLM Coding Plan and APIs effective Feb 12; first-purchase discounts cancelled, seasonal/annual discounts retained.
  • 2Domestic package prices rise at least 30%; overseas increases are larger (subscriptions +30–60%; API calls +67–100%).
  • 3Existing subscribers keep their current pricing; the company attributes the change to rapid growth in user scale and call volumes and to rising compute and optimisation costs.
  • 4The simultaneous overseas launch of GLM-5 elevated the move into a global commercial context and triggered a positive market reaction for Zhipu’s listed shares.
  • 5The adjustment signals a sectoral shift from subsidy-driven, low-price strategies to value-and-quality-based competition, with implications for developers, chip suppliers and rival model vendors.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

Zhipu’s decision to hike prices while taking GLM-5 global is arguably the clearest signal yet that China’s large-model ecosystem is entering a commercial second phase. The immediate drivers are operational: token consumption is ballooning, and ensuring low-latency, high-availability services at scale demands substantial capital for chips, cloud capacity and engineering resources. But the strategic meaning runs deeper. If other domestic vendors follow, we should expect a market reallocation from hobbyist and low-volume experimentation toward enterprise engagements and tiered product strategies. That will benefit infrastructure suppliers and firms able to package reliability and compliance as premium features, but it also risks stifling grassroots developer innovation if entry costs rise too quickly. Watch for three flashpoints over the coming quarters: competitive responses (price or differentiation), customer churn among small developers, and regulatory or reputational scrutiny as Chinese models pursue global customers.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

Zhipu Technology (智谱) has enacted the most significant price increase by a domestic large-language-model vendor since the start of 2026, raising subscription and API fees for its GLM Coding Plan as it simultaneously launched the new GLM-5 model overseas. The company announced on February 12 that package prices would rise broadly, existing subscribers would keep their current rates, and the first-purchase discount would be removed while seasonal and annual discounts remain. The move takes effect immediately and, according to documents released by Zhipu, responds to sharply accelerating developer demand and sustained high-load usage of its code-generation and programming-assistant products.

The scale of the increase is material. The company said domestic package prices would climb by at least 30%, while a version of its overseas roll-out showed even larger adjustments: Coding Plan subscriptions up 30–60% and API call prices rising between roughly 67% and 100%. Zhipu justifies the change as necessary to underwrite heavier investment in compute capacity, model optimisation and operational resilience as usage outstrips the company’s original infrastructure plans. To blunt customer pain, the firm has frozen prices for existing subscribers and said further adjustments will be guided by market feedback.

Markets responded quickly: Hong Kong AI concept shares linked to Zhipu jumped on the news, reflecting investor appetite for demonstrable monetisation. The company’s simultaneous overseas release of GLM-5 — rather than a domestic-only debut — amplified attention, framing the price move as part of a global commercial strategy rather than a local test. The rollout has not been entirely smooth; online critics allege technical and provenance questions about GLM-5, underscoring reputational risks that can accompany rapid product expansion.

This episode matters because it signals a structural shift in China’s big-model sector. After years of low-cost, subsidy-driven user acquisition, at least some vendors are now charging rates that reflect rising unit costs and product value. Industry data cited by Zhipu and market trackers align: semiconductor markets remain robust and AI compute demand is a leading growth driver, squeezing suppliers and lifting hardware and cloud costs. Vendors that once prioritized market share through aggressive pricing increasingly confront trade-offs between growth, service quality and sustainable margins.

The near-term consequences are straightforward. Higher API and subscription prices will raise the threshold for small-scale experimentation and shift some usage toward enterprise customers with predictable budgets or to vendors offering cheaper, lower-capacity tiers. That could benefit cloud and chip suppliers as enterprise contracts expand, while producing churn risk among cost-sensitive developers and start-ups. Zhipu’s decision to grandfather existing users is designed to mitigate reneging, but broader sectoral price normalisation would test developers’ willingness to pay and the elasticity of token consumption.

Strategically, Zhipu’s move is a bellwether. It demonstrates growing commercial confidence among China’s AI start-ups and highlights the centrality of compute investments to product reliability. It also raises governance and competitive questions: rivals will weigh whether to follow, regulators and customers will scrutinise service-level assurances, and global expansion will expose Chinese models to reputational and IP-related scrutiny. For foreign buyers and partners, the episode is a reminder that commercialisation — not just capability parity — will determine which models win long-term adoption.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found