Satellite Images Show Japan’s Izumo-Class Ships Becoming Carrier-Capable — A Regional Turning Point

Satellite imagery through November 2025 shows visible progress in Japan’s retrofit of its Izumo-class ships to operate F-35B fighters, with bow reshaping and hangar upgrades under way. Tokyo plans to complete the conversions by fiscal years 2027–2028, a move that enhances U.S.-Japan interoperability but has drawn strong objections from Beijing, which frames the changes as a dangerous turn toward re-militarisation.

Training jet with Japanese insignia taxiing for preparation on airfield.

Key Takeaways

  • 1Satellites updated in November 2025 show JS Izumo’s bow reshaped to support F-35B operations; the ship class has been reclassified from DDH to CVM.
  • 2Japan began multi-stage conversions in 2020, with a second major phase starting in 2024; Izumo and Kaga are slated to finish conversions in FY2027 and FY2028.
  • 3Tokyo has received the first batch of its ordered F-35B fighters and has used Izumo-class decks in multinational exercises with U.S. and U.K. F-35Bs.
  • 4China has issued repeated diplomatic protests, warning against the ‘remilitarisation’ of Japan and calling for international vigilance.
  • 5The conversions are strategically significant for alliance interoperability and regional signalling, even if the immediate force-multiplying effect is limited.

Editor's
Desk

Strategic Analysis

Viewed strategically, the Izumo conversions are less a sudden leap in Japanese capability than a deliberate, incremental normalization of power-projection tools under the rubric of collective defence with the United States. They embed Japan more deeply in alliance logistics and operational planning, giving Washington additional platforms from which to disperse air power across the first island chain. For Beijing, even symbolic enhancements to Japanese maritime aviation capacity necessitate doctrinal and procurement responses, increasing the risk of reciprocal measures, heightened surveillance, and sharper naval posturing. Managing this dynamic will require clear crisis communication channels, transparency measures about force employment, and diplomatic mechanisms to prevent tactical interactions from escalating into broader confrontation.

China Daily Brief Editorial
Strategic Insight
China Daily Brief

Recent satellite imagery updated in November 2025 exposes visible progress in Japan’s conversion of its Izumo-class “helicopter destroyers” into vessels capable of operating F-35B vertical/short takeoff and landing fighters. The images, taken over the Yokohama Isogo shipyard and reported by U.S. Newsweek, show the bow of JS Izumo reshaped from a trapezoid into a more rectangular profile — a modification Tokyo says is designed to facilitate F-35B operations and to harden the flight deck against jet exhaust.

The changes are part of a multi-stage retrofit that began in 2020 with deck markings and heat-resistant coatings; a second phase that started in 2024 focused on reshaping the bow and upgrading onboard maintenance facilities. Japan has reclassified the vessels from DDH (helicopter destroyer) to CVM (multi-purpose, carrier-capable vessel) and the defence ministry has signalled that Izumo and her sister ship Kaga should complete their conversions in fiscal years 2027 and 2028 respectively.

The technical rationale is straightforward: the F-35B’s short-takeoff/vertical-landing capability lets it operate from ships that lack US-style full-length carrier decks and catapults. Tokyo received the first tranche of its ordered F-35Bs in August last year and has deployed some to Nyutabaru air base, while international exercises have already seen F-35Bs land on the Izumo-class decks during Anglo-American-Japanese drills in August 2025.

For Tokyo and Washington the conversions enhance maritime interoperability across the first island chain, increasing options to project air power from Japanese-flagged platforms and to integrate with forward-deployed U.S. carrier and amphibious groups. U.S. commentary frames Japan as a key treaty partner whose upgraded platforms would bolster deterrence by enabling seamless operations with American carriers and amphibious assault ships in a potential contingency.

Beijing has responded with repeated diplomatic warnings and sharp rhetoric. Chinese officials and state media portray the conversions as evidence of Japan stepping beyond the defensive bounds of its postwar security posture, characterising the upgrades as steps toward “re-militarisation” and invoking historical sensitivities about Japanese militarism.

The practical effect of converting two ships is limited in scale but large in symbolism. Two carrier-capable decks do not equal a sovereign blue-water carrier fleet, but they provide Tokyo with a more flexible force posture, complicate Beijing’s operational calculations, and tighten operational ties with the U.S. Navy. These factors make the refits consequential for regional signalling even as their immediate combat impact remains modest.

Washington, Tokyo and Beijing are likely to treat the developments differently: the allies as force-multiplying and stabilising through deterrence, and China as escalatory and destabilising. The near-term implication is a higher tempo of surveillance, diplomacy and naval deployments as neighbours test boundaries and seek to reassure partners or domestic audiences.

Editor's Analysis

The Izumo conversions crystallise a broader strategic trend: Japan’s steady shift from strictly defensive platforms toward more expeditionary, interoperable capabilities that blur the line between self-defence and power projection. That trajectory is driven by Tokyo’s assessment of regional threats, closer operational integration with the United States, and domestic political moves to normalize Japan’s security role. In practice the upgrades will increase the operational reach and flexibility of U.S.-Japan maritime forces while also amplifying Chinese incentives to accelerate naval and air-force modernization, complicating crisis stability in East Asia. Policymakers in Tokyo and Washington will face a choice between managing these capabilities within tighter transparency and restraint frameworks or risking an arms-dynamics spiral that heightens miscalculation during crises.

Share Article

Related Articles

📰
No related articles found